Critical Race Theory

Is racism a permanence of human kind?

According to Critical Race Theory's [CRT] foundational perspectives, racism is a permanent feature of human kind. Harvard Law Professor Derrick Bell maintained this feature in his original written works (see Faces at The Bottom of The Well, The Permanence of Racism). The CRT ideologies evolved out of the Civil Rights Movement and critical thinking frameworks. But over time the CRT approach went beyond just the analysis of racial issues and become an activist movement. It has the unique elements often found with postmodern approaches in that it isolates what is considered a specific group (topic/idea). It places strong requirements on that group and limits their position of rebuttal. Modern CRT takes the problem to be solved a step further by declaring it unsolvable and recommends the best course of action is the perceived battle itself. In this case, the fight is the solution and longsuffering oppression is the plight of the activist. This breaks from the groundwork of actual critical thinking that has a single purpose to isolate and solve the problem, whereupon a solution is a requirement of the endeavor. Ultimately CRT makes an argument that it declares unsolvable at the onset and then insists that the enduring battle be waged by both the activist's perspective, as well as the accused oppressor. Even if the oppressor is unaware, it becomes their responsibility to take the mantle of the fight into the field of battle by acknowledging their own racist tendencies that are classified by CRT as inevitably overt or even unconscious. The oppressor is accused, tried, and convicted and then sentenced to being racist forevermore without chance of reprieve or parole. The practical upshot is an ingenious, built-in defense mechanism against any defiance of its authority. Any attempt to argue a point in defiance of the CRT position immediately classifies someone as racist.

However, a remakable problem with CRT has arisen in the last twenty years (publication of this is 2022). Intersectionality appeared. This is where one group of oppressed people align with another group of oppressed people, but one of the groups has something in common with the other's oppressor model. So they sort of get along on most things, but one thing doesn't fit. An example would be a black lady that wants to join a women's rights group only to discover the local group is comprised of mostly white women. She is outside of her camp of colored people if she goes to the women's group, because the white people are the oppressor (the enemy).

Keep in mind that the Women's Rights Movement was strong and moving forward with great attention along side these developments. Femiminism had a foothold on political interest just like race consciousness had. This forced the two topics into the same camp even if they didn't wish it. They had to share the public interest and of course that meant some degree of competition. But that would fly in the face of the oppressed if one of the two groups (CRT and Feminism) conflicted with each other. And that's where they intersected. They had the common ground of being oppressed. But one couldn't oppress the other without the obvious hypocrisy that would arise. So, they supported each other though the necessity of their collective framework because politicians inexorably categorized them together as campaign topics. They had to cooperate because the public eye evaluated them in the same boat - the oppressed.

It wasn't long until even more groups of people that classified themselves as oppressed strongly identified with the activist approach that CRT was employing. They used the same methodology of postmodern thinkers to some extent, but also relied heavily on the Civil Rights Movement and Affirmative Action. At the height of homosexual rights (in America specifically) the nomenclature was strongly gay and lesbian. And these people strongly identified with that mode of thinking as many do to this day. It's important to note that homosexual rights strongly rested on the distinction of male and female as the only sexes. Otherwise a homosexual disposition wouldn't correlate where it distinctly involved two men, or two women. To the same magnitude that racial issues are hot topics, so became gay and lesbian considerations, especially when it came to marriage and the right to adopt children. Again, politicians added this group of oppressed peoples into women's rights and racism. A new term was introduced to bring them together in the public eye. Equality for all. And everyone was happy to support this except for a large portion of Americans that opposed gay marriage. This contributed to the largest division in opinion over a single issue since Roe-v-Wade.

So what did that do to intersectionality between the oppressed groups of black people, women, and homosexuals? A good portion of colored people and women didn't like the idea of gay marriage. All of a sudden there was a breakdown in how well oppressed groups could overlap their ideologies, and it created internal breaks that further divided opinion in American. Imagine if you were a white gay man that supported the local women's group that was mostly black and favored traditional family structures? Churches, Synagogues, and Mosques were going to have to start showing some flexibility in their strict interpretations of scripture to accommodate or fear losing their congregations - and their tax free donations as well. All of a sudden the public eye doesn't just follow the political narrative. Now it is going to follow a religious narrative as well since the foundation of marriage for thousands of years was based on the predominate religions in America. Now the factors of division that started decades ago with Critical Race Theory have gone from something simple to all three groups, now people of color, women's rights, and gay rights - further divided by politics, and then again by religion. You do the math. These three groups split in half by politics makes six different groups. And Three split by religion, another six groups. And every possible combination of those factors. This only fueled the division in America further. In the meantime, CRT hasn't solved the issue about racism and if anything made the matter worse because their original concentration of attention has been diluted among so many varieties.

Not long after these rights were addressed, a somewhat overlooked sector of society surfaced as the new topic of discussion. This is where the transsexual/transvestite lifestyles of the past became the transgender and gender dysphonia issue of the modern narrative. By now the LGB (lesbian, gay, and bisexual) identity that had existed for so long added yet more groups of oppressed people. Now they were LGBTQ+ [and a variety of other identities that have similar sexual connotations]. At this point there wasn't clarity on what all these identities actually were. That they existed through any proclamation was enough to include them by merit of personal declaration. It became a simple matter of saying "I am 'this'." And furthermore, "'This' is:" followed by some reasoning left solely up to the individual. The transgender ideologies and their respective medical issues became highly energized politically and socially. Once again, they were immediately absorbed under the protective umbrella of oppressed people. And of course, the subsequent divisions of intersectionality arose, specifically with the original set of gay and lesbian people. At the time of this publication (2022) there is a growing number of gay and lesbian people that expressly do not want to be associated with the TQ+[etc] identities because it doesn't represent their lifestyle or personal beliefs. For instance - the predominate argument now is gender-fluid and non-binary esteem. This mode of thinking is not compatible with the gay and lesbian disposition that heavily relies on the distinct definition of sex being not only binary, but expressly male and female. Without this concrete view, a homosexual loses their own identity that has been well established for ages past. Now when gay and lesbian people speak up about the inappropriate addition of TQ+ to their already established namesake, they are labeled as transphobic. For example the LGB Alliance founders have been dealing with just this issue as noted by GBNews in this video. This isn’t limited to homosexuals either. The same problem arises with women’s rights. Trans men that identify as women entering the private spaces of women and competing in women’s sports is mainstream news. It isn’t a stretch of imagination to think about the balance of white transgender people compared to colored transgender people. Will the assertions of CRT insist that white transgender people are privileged and ultimately racist supremacists?

When the oppressed begin to deny other oppressed persons, those denied retaliate with a vengeance. Greater division occurs and the problems with the framework begin to collapse. Or so it would seem. However, with each new generation of new groups of oppressed people come a completely new political base from which to launch accusation. It is in the political engine’s best interest to promote new variants of the same argument simply to have a platform by which to divide votes. That directly influences mass media and advertising revenue. The oppressed people don’t even realize they are slaves to their own mechanism they use to broadcast their plight and activism. This all results in primetime news ratings, ad ratings on social media platforms, and of course a never ending hate the hater public theater.

The new narrative that will take over the transgender realm is now called ‘minor-attracted persons’ directly referring to pedophiles. If history is any teacher then we can expect a strong push to accept the pedophile’s sexually deviant behavior as acceptable and normal - because that’s just who they are and they identify as such.

The collective of oppressed people will have to accept this new group by their own internal reasoning. If they don’t, they will be labeled pedo-phobic; if that’s even a word yet. So all the rights the former groups have must therefore be given to the pedophiles. That includes marriage of course.

This continual cycle of behavior coordinates with Mass Formation Psychosis. If left on its current course, there will be no law. Lawlessness will dominate our civilization and it will ultimately fall. The question has to be asked, when will these behaviors be realized for mental illness as they once were just ten years ago? How has this spiraled so for out of control? What approach is there to bring it to a stop, reverse the damages done, and restore sanity back to the civilization?

Otherwise, murder is next. Because you will be able to identify as a murderer.

But every time the new cycle begins, the former cycle says “I can’t believe this is happening.” And no one seems to get the procession of this simple extrapolation. It shouldn’t be a stretch of the imagination at all for a trans man identifying as a woman murderer getting married to a non-binary trans female child that identifies as an African American male. If that sounds absurd, then ask when it happened that none of the former was absurd.

I happened when you let it. And that is the essence of Mass Transformation Psychosis.

This all boils down to institutions of power regardless of which group was what, how they saw other groups, and weather or not they would collectively agree on anything or be opposed. What are institutions of power? They are politics, education, housing, health care, banking and financing, voting rights, property ownership, just to name a few. The psychosis has to be removed from all institutions of power to restore sanity.